ad

Wrexham Council wins compensation battle against quarry firm

Published date: 22 July 2011 |
Published by: Staff reporter


 

WREXHAM Council has won a £6 million-plus compensation battle with Mersey Waste Holdings Associates over Hafod Quarry.

Following an inquiry held earlier this year the tribunal has now declared MWH is not entitled to compensation.

Lawrence Isted, the council’s head of community well-being and development, said: “I am pleased the council has won this case and council taxpayers will not be required to compensate Mersey Waste.

“I pay tribute to the council’s legal and planning officers and advisers who have worked tirelessly to achieve this outcome.”

The claim arose from a planning committee decision to issue revised conditions in respect of the consent to extract minerals at the Johnstown site. The Review of old Minerals Planning Permission (ROMP) followed the designation of part of the site as a Special Area of Conservation (SAC).

The effect of the ROMP is to restrict working rights within the SAC. The claim was defended by the local authority on the basis that there was no compensation payable, as the claimant had expressed a clear intention not to work the claim area prior to the making of the ROMP.

Wrexham Council says the tribunal decision vindicates its stance.

A statement released by the authority read: “While there has been significant cost to the council in defending the claim, the overall saving to the public purse is substantial given that the value of the initial claim was nearly £7m – loss of minerals £5.6m and loss of voidspace £1.3m.”

A spokeswoman added the council would be able to put in a claim for costs.

You must be a registered user to leave a comment. Register or login here.

  1. Posted by: Boycs at 10:19 on 22 July 2011 Report

    £6 million would have to have been set aside in case of the council losing the case, so essentially this is a £6 million bonus. C'mon wcbc, do the right thing and spend this wisely. A chance to restore some faith

  2. Posted by: tommy at 11:38 on 22 July 2011 Report

    Perhaps all of this could have been avoided altogether if planning permission had been refused in the first place.

 

Local vouchers

View all vouchers


Featured Businesses

View all adverts

Resources